Richardson v. Rogers and Middlebrooks, Inc.

4 So. 2d 517, 148 Fla. 451, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 916
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 12, 1941
StatusPublished

This text of 4 So. 2d 517 (Richardson v. Rogers and Middlebrooks, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richardson v. Rogers and Middlebrooks, Inc., 4 So. 2d 517, 148 Fla. 451, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 916 (Fla. 1941).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Careful study of the record in this case convinces us that the trial court erred in instructing a verdict for the defendant at the conclusion of the introduction of testimony on behalf of the plaintiff, therefore, the judgment is reversed.

, Brown, C. J., Terrell, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 So. 2d 517, 148 Fla. 451, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-rogers-and-middlebrooks-inc-fla-1941.