Richardson v. Richardson

1 Thompson 66, 1 Shan. Cas. 42
CourtTennessee Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1850
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 1 Thompson 66 (Richardson v. Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richardson v. Richardson, 1 Thompson 66, 1 Shan. Cas. 42 (Tenn. 1850).

Opinion

Lyon, Special J.:

This is' a bill to settle an insolvent estate. Certain creditors not being made parties by the bill, come into Court, defend, and appeal from the decree of the Chancellor to this Court. The bill' of exceptions states that the creditors appealing, have been regarded as parties; but there is no order of record' making them such. The proper practice is, for the creditors to come in by petition and have themselves made parties.1 The recitals in the record afford sufficient ground to- award a certiorari to [67]*67the Court below to send up a more perfect record. If that is not desired and asked for, the appeal will be dismissed.

The Act of 1837 does not do away with the necessity of showing the proper parties to be before the Court, That Act was intended only to diminish costs, by preventing the record from being encumbered with matter not relevant to the point to be brought up.

•Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cowling v. Cowling, Unpublished Decision (5-26-2004)
2004 Ohio 2665 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)
Dugan Brothers of N.J. v. Robinson
51 A.2d 218 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1939
In Re Thompson's Estate
269 P. 103 (Utah Supreme Court, 1927)
Sutton v. Thompson
269 P. 103 (Utah Supreme Court, 1927)
Oxborough v. St. Martin
210 N.W. 854 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1926)
Laduca v. Draves
145 A.D. 159 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
Knickerbocker v. Robinson
83 A.D. 614 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
Smith v. Birdsall
106 Ill. App. 264 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1903)
Garnett v. Meyers
91 N.W. 400 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1902)
People ex rel. Bibb v. Mayor & Common Council
193 Ill. 309 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1901)
Berger v. . Varrelmann
27 N.E. 1065 (New York Court of Appeals, 1891)
Collar v. Patterson
27 N.E. 604 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1891)
McElroy v. Ludlum
32 N.J. Eq. 828 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Thompson 66, 1 Shan. Cas. 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-richardson-tenn-1850.