Richardson v. Richardson

2 Mass. 153
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 15, 1806·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The statute gives the Court jurisdiction only in the county where the parties live. This is an attempt to evade the statute, and must not be countenanced. Without deciding the [148]*148case, where the party charged with adultery shall have left his or her domicile, we are clearly of opinion that, in this case, where the party complaining has only changed his residence, and the other party continues at the place of her former dwelling, the libel ought not to be sustained in the county where the former resides.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson v. Richardson, 2 Mass. 153 (Mass. 1806).

2 Mass. 153 (Richardson v. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sampson v. Sampson
223 Mass. 451 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1916)
Vence v. Vence
15 How. Pr. 497 (New York Supreme Court, 1858)
Harding v. Alden
9 Me. 140 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1832)
Commonwealth v. Inhabitants of Stockbridge
11 Mass. 279 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1814)
Hopkins v. Hopkins
3 Mass. 158 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1807)
Squire v. Squire
3 Mass. 184 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1807)