Richardson v. Plantation General Hospital

976 So. 2d 649, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 3449, 2008 WL 649576
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 12, 2008·No. No. 4D07-2032·Published

Opinion

DAMOORGIAN, J.

Allon and Evelin Richardson appeal from summary judgment granted in favor of Plantation General Hospital. In its motion, the hospital argued that the language of a general release between appellants [650] and a joint tortfeasor also released the hospital. The record before the trial court unequivocally established by unrebutted evidence that the release and addendum do not and were never intended to release the hospital. Smith v. Shelton, 970 So.2d 450, 451 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (construction of a contract is an issue of law subject to de novo review). Therefore, trial court improperly granted Plantation General’s motion for summary judgment. Albelo v. S. Bell, 682 So.2d 1126, 1129 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). We therefore reverse.

Reversed.

KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson v. Plantation General Hospital, 976 So. 2d 649, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 3449, 2008 WL 649576 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

976 So. 2d 649 (Richardson v. Plantation General Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Albelo v. Southern Bell
682 So. 2d 1126 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Smith v. Shelton
970 So. 2d 450 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)