Richardson v. Pitts
56 S.E. 105, 127 Ga. 107, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 757
Opinion
1. “Where each of two coterminous proprietors recognizes the ownership of the other, and that the tract of each is bounded by that of the other, the ascertainment of the true line between them fixes the extent of their respective tracts.” Phillips v. O’Neal, 87 Ga. 727; Farr v. Woolfolk, 118 Ga. 277.
2. There was sufficient evidence to authorize the charge complained of, and to support the verdict. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Richardson v. Pitts, 56 S.E. 105, 127 Ga. 107, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 757 (Ga. 1906).
56 S.E. 105 (Richardson v. Pitts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rutland v. Taylor
209 S.E.2d 218 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1974)
Clay v. Stanfield
119 S.E.2d 564 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1961)
Crawford v. Cook
51 S.E.2d 422 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1949)