Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Richardson v. Pitts

Richardson v. Pitts

56 S.E. 105, 127 Ga. 107, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 757
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 13, 1906
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 56 S.E. 105 (Richardson v. Pitts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richardson v. Pitts, 56 S.E. 105, 127 Ga. 107, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 757 (Ga. 1906).

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

1. “Where each of two coterminous proprietors recognizes the ownership of the other, and that the tract of each is bounded by that of the other, the ascertainment of the true line between them fixes the extent of their respective tracts.” Phillips v. O’Neal, 87 Ga. 727; Farr v. Woolfolk, 118 Ga. 277.

2. There was sufficient evidence to authorize the charge complained of, and to support the verdict. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rutland v. Taylor
209 S.E.2d 218 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1974)
Clay v. Stanfield
119 S.E.2d 564 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1961)
Crawford v. Cook
51 S.E.2d 422 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 S.E. 105, 127 Ga. 107, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-pitts-ga-1906.