Richardson v. Peyton

District of Columbia

Richardson v. Peyton

1 D.C. 418

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedJuly 15, 1807

StatusPublished

This text of 1 D.C. 418 (Richardson v. Peyton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richardson v. Peyton, 1 D.C. 418 (D.D.C. 1807).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court

(Duckett, J., absent,)

refused to hear Mr. Swann in reply, and said the. point had been often decided, that if a contract be not complied with on one part, and the other party had paid his money, he may disaffirm the contract, and recover back his money in an action for money had and received.

Verdict for the plaintiff.

The defendant took a bill of exceptions, but did not bring a writ of error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court

(Duckett, J., absent,)

refused to hear Mr. Swann in reply, and said the. point had been often decided, that if a contract be not complied with on one part, and the other party had paid his money, he may disaffirm the contract, and recover back his money in an action for money had and received.

Verdict for the plaintiff.

The defendant took a bill of exceptions, but did not bring a writ of error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 D.C. 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-peyton-dcd-1807.