Richardson v. Pennington

69 S.W. 838, 4 Indian Terr. 172, 1902 Indian Terr. LEXIS 16
Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory·Decided September 25, 1902·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Gill. C. J.

The record in this case fails to disclose the evidence or stipulation upon which judgment of the court below was founded, and we have no means of knowing, so far as the record discloses, what the evidence was before the court, other than that there was a motion for judgment on a stipulation, which stipulation does not appear in the record; that a response was filed to said motion; that a trial was had to the court upon such motion and response; that evidence was submitted (what it was we cannot know), and the court pronounced its judgment. In this incomplete and unsatisfactory state of affairs this court will refuse to review the record, or attempt to change or modify the judgment of the court below, and such judgment is, therefore, by this court affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson v. Pennington, 69 S.W. 838, 4 Indian Terr. 172, 1902 Indian Terr. LEXIS 16 (Conn. 1902).

69 S.W. 838 (Richardson v. Pennington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Farmers' & Merchants' Bank of Coweta v. Sharum
1908 OK 163 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1908)