Richardson v. Office of Personnel Management

163 F. App'x 863

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided December 16, 2005·No. No. 06-3025·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Walter Richardson, Jr. moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and submits a Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) statement concerning discrimination. We consider whether we should vacate the court’s November 17, 2005 order dismissing Richardson’s petition for review for failure to pay the filing fee and file a Rule 15(c) statement.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Richardson’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

(2) The court’s November 17, 2005 dismissal order is vacated, the mandate is recalled, and the petition for review is reinstated.

(3) Richardson’s brief is due within 21 days of the date of filing of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Richardson’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

(2) The court’s November 17, 2005 dismissal order is vacated, the mandate is recalled, and the petition for review is reinstated.

(3) Richardson’s brief is due within 21 days of the date of filing of this order.

Richardson v. Office of Personnel Management, 163 F. App'x 863 (Fed. Cir. 2005).

Pincite

163 F. App'x 863 (Richardson v. Office of Personnel Management) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.