Richardson v. North Carolina Department of Correction

26 F. App'x 345
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 7, 2002
Docket01-7132
StatusUnpublished

This text of 26 F. App'x 345 (Richardson v. North Carolina Department of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richardson v. North Carolina Department of Correction, 26 F. App'x 345 (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kent Allen Richardson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find Richardson’s appeal is moot. While Richardson challenges the calculation of his release date, he has been released from custody, and he does not allege that collateral consequences warrant *346 relief. See Vandenberg v. Rodgers, 801 F.2d 377, 378 (10th Cir.1986). Further, we decline review of his claim for monetary damages raised for the first time on appeal because Richardson has not alleged exceptional circumstances. See Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir.1993).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss Richardson’s appeal as moot. Further, we deny Richardson’s motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kenneth B. Vandenberg v. George H. Rodgers
801 F.2d 377 (Tenth Circuit, 1986)
D.P. Muth J.P. Muth v. United States
1 F.3d 246 (Fourth Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 F. App'x 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-north-carolina-department-of-correction-ca4-2002.