Richardson v. Norcross

80 F. Supp. 799, 78 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 122, 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2182
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided June 21, 1948·No. C. A. No. 36291·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

McGUIRE, District Judge.

I cannot conclude that the alleged mark “Susie Cucumber” is confusingly similar to the co-defendant Norcross’ registered trade-mark, as one is for letters and the other for greeting cards which are purchased over the counter, while the letters have to be ordered.

However, plaintiff’s suit must be dismissed for the reason that the name ■“Susie Cucumber” is incapable of registration as a trade-mark, since it is used as plaintiff’s pseudonym and signature and not as a true trade-mark. This case is disposed of it seems to me by In re Page Co., 47 App.D.C. 195.

The words Susie Cucumber being the title of a book and a series of letters is descriptive, and as a consequence unregistrable.

Counsel will prepare proper papers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson v. Norcross, 80 F. Supp. 799, 78 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 122, 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2182 (D.D.C. 1948).

80 F. Supp. 799 (Richardson v. Norcross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daggett & Ramsdell, Inc. v. Marzall
128 F. Supp. 906 (District of Columbia, 1954)