Richardson v. New York City Housing Authority—Gompers Houses

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Richardson v. New York City Housing Authority—Gompers Houses

55 Misc. 3d 32, 50 N.Y.S.3d 786

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 28, 2016

StatusPublished

This text of 55 Misc. 3d 32 (Richardson v. New York City Housing Authority—Gompers Houses) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richardson v. New York City Housing Authority—Gompers Houses, 55 Misc. 3d 32, 50 N.Y.S.3d 786 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

[33]*33OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Order, dated July 26, 2016, affirmed, without costs. Order, dated September 22, 2016, modified, by striking the condition barring tenant from filming or videotaping the required repairs to be performed by landlord; as modified, order affirmed without costs.

In the absence of any evidence that tenant’s intra-apartment video surveillance system interfered with landlord’s attempts to make required repairs, tenant should not have been barred from filming the repair work conducted within her apartment. There being no cause to further delay the abatement of the long-standing mold condition in tenant’s bathroom and to complete other previously ordered repairs, landlord is directed to undertake this work forthwith.

We have examined tenant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Schoenfeld, J.P., and Ling-Cohan, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI