Richardson v. M'Cray

5 S.C.L. 404
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedNovember 15, 1814
StatusPublished

This text of 5 S.C.L. 404 (Richardson v. M'Cray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richardson v. M'Cray, 5 S.C.L. 404 (S.C. 1814).

Opinion

Smith, J.

This doctrine would be monstrous. In the first place, the defendant was not liable for the expenses attendant on the prosecution of his negro for a public offence ; and secondly, because it would thwart every principle of law, to make him so upon the mere act of the plaintiff.

No man can, by a voluntary payment of the debt of another, make himself that man’s creditor. This is the opinion of Lord Kenyon, in 8 Durnf. and East, 613. The same judge gives his opinion on the same ground-, in another case, same book, 310. And the position is so self evident, that it cannot need authorities to maintain it. I am of opinion that a new trial should be granted.

Bay, Nott, Brevakd, and Colcock, Js., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 S.C.L. 404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-mcray-sc-1814.