Richardson v. Maxim Healthcare/Allegis Group

676 S.E.2d 472, 363 N.C. 260
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Richardson v. Maxim Healthcare/Allegis Group. Read the opinion of the Court — 362 N.C. 657
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 6, 2009·No. 102A08-2·Published

Opinion

676 S.E.2d 472 (2009)

Penny M. Rumple RICHARDSON, Employee, Plaintiff
v.
MAXIM HEALTHCARE/ALLEGIS GROUP, Employer and Kemper Insurance Company/American Protection Insurance c/o Specialty Risk Services, Carrier, Defendants.

No. 102A08-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2009.

Jolinda Babcock, Winston-Salem, for Maxim Healthcare/Allegis Group.

Anne Harris, George W. Lennon, Raleigh, for Richardson.

Prior report: 362 N.C. 657, 669 S.E.2d 582.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 15th day of January 2009 for rehearing of the decision of this Court pursuant to Rule 31, N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 2009."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson v. Maxim Healthcare/Allegis Group, 676 S.E.2d 472, 363 N.C. 260 (N.C. 2009).

676 S.E.2d 472 (Richardson v. Maxim Healthcare/Allegis Group) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richardson v. Maxim Healthcare/Allegis Group
669 S.E.2d 582 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2008)