Richardson v. Maryland

Fourth Circuit

Richardson v. Maryland

300 F. App'x 194

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 14, 2008·No. No. 08-1802·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Earl L. Richardson appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action complaining about the termination of social security benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v. The Great State of Maryland, No. l:08-cv-01087-CCB (D.Md. July 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Earl L. Richardson appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action complaining about the termination of social security benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v. The Great State of Maryland, No. l:08-cv-01087-CCB (D.Md. July 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Richardson v. Maryland, 300 F. App'x 194 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

300 F. App'x 194 (Richardson v. Maryland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.