Richardson v. Maryland

Fourth Circuit

Richardson v. Maryland

300 F. App'x 194

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 14, 2008

DocketNo. 08-1802

StatusPublished

This text of 300 F. App'x 194 (Richardson v. Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richardson v. Maryland, 300 F. App'x 194 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Earl L. Richardson appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action complaining about the termination of social security benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v. The Great State of Maryland, No. l:08-cv-01087-CCB (D.Md. July 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Earl L. Richardson appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action complaining about the termination of social security benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v. The Great State of Maryland, No. l:08-cv-01087-CCB (D.Md. July 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

300 F. App'x 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-maryland-ca4-2008.