Richardson v. J. M. Edmunds Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Richardson v. J. M. Edmunds Co.

183 S.E. 286, 209 N.C. 837, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 370

DecidedJanuary 22, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 183 S.E. 286 (Richardson v. J. M. Edmunds Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richardson v. J. M. Edmunds Co., 183 S.E. 286, 209 N.C. 837, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 370 (N.C. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only exceptions brought forward in appellant’s brief are those relating to the charge in which it is contended the court failed to “state in a plain and correct manner the evidence given in the case,” and likewise failed to “declare and explain the law arising thereon,” as required by C. S., 564. The exceptions are not of sufficient merit to call for elaboration or to warrant ■ a new trial. Hence, the verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The only exceptions brought forward in appellant’s brief are those relating to the charge in which it is contended the court failed to “state in a plain and correct manner the evidence given in the case,” and likewise failed to “declare and explain the law arising thereon,” as required by C. S., 564. The exceptions are not of sufficient merit to call for elaboration or to warrant ■ a new trial. Hence, the verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 S.E. 286, 209 N.C. 837, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-j-m-edmunds-co-nc-1936.