Richardson v. Honeywell, Inc.

188 So. 2d 303, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3362
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 20, 1966
DocketNo. 34576
StatusPublished

This text of 188 So. 2d 303 (Richardson v. Honeywell, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richardson v. Honeywell, Inc., 188 So. 2d 303, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3362 (Fla. 1966).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date 30 June 1965. After oral argument and consideration of the petition, the record and briefs, we conclude the petition should be and is, therefore, denied.

[304]*304The petition for attorneys’ fees also is denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur. BARNES, PAUL D., J. (Retired), dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spivey v. Battaglia Fruit Company
138 So. 2d 308 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1962)
Victor Wine & Liquor, Inc. v. Beasley
141 So. 2d 581 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1962)
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Hudson
112 So. 2d 29 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Zerwal v. Caribbean Modes, Inc.
170 So. 2d 840 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 So. 2d 303, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-honeywell-inc-fla-1966.