Richardson v. Honeywell, Inc.

188 So. 2d 303, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3362
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 20, 1966·No. No. 34576·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date 30 June 1965. After oral argument and consideration of the petition, the record and briefs, we conclude the petition should be and is, therefore, denied.

[304] The petition for attorneys’ fees also is denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur. BARNES, PAUL D., J. (Retired), dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson v. Honeywell, Inc., 188 So. 2d 303, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3362 (Fla. 1966).

188 So. 2d 303 (Richardson v. Honeywell, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spivey v. Battaglia Fruit Company
138 So. 2d 308 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1962)
Victor Wine & Liquor, Inc. v. Beasley
141 So. 2d 581 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1962)
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Hudson
112 So. 2d 29 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Zerwal v. Caribbean Modes, Inc.
170 So. 2d 840 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1965)