Richardson v. Hennly

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Richardson v. Hennly

448 S.E.2d 91, 214 Ga. App. 364, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 2723, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 927

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedAugust 3, 1994

DocketA93A0680; A93A0807

StatusPublished

This text of 448 S.E.2d 91 (Richardson v. Hennly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richardson v. Hennly, 448 S.E.2d 91, 214 Ga. App. 364, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 2723, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 927 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Smith, Judge.

In Richardson v. Hennly, 209 Ga. App. 868 (434 SE2d 772) (1993), this court affirmed the judgment in Case No. A93A0807 and reversed the judgment in Case No. A93A0680, holding that summary judgment was not appropriate in either case. The Supreme Court reversed our judgment in Hennly v. Richardson, 264 Ga. 355 (444 SE2d 317) (1994), holding that summary judgment was appropriate in both cases. Accordingly, our prior decision in these cases is vacated and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court. The judgment of the trial court granting partial summary judgment to Hennly is affirmed in Case No. A93A0680. The judgment of the trial court denying summary judgment to First Federal is reversed in Case No. A93A0807.

Judgment affirmed in Case No. A93A0680.

Judgment reversed in Case No. A93A0807. Johnson and Blackburn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, Judge.

In Richardson v. Hennly, 209 Ga. App. 868 (434 SE2d 772) (1993), this court affirmed the judgment in Case No. A93A0807 and reversed the judgment in Case No. A93A0680, holding that summary judgment was not appropriate in either case. The Supreme Court reversed our judgment in Hennly v. Richardson, 264 Ga. 355 (444 SE2d 317) (1994), holding that summary judgment was appropriate in both cases. Accordingly, our prior decision in these cases is vacated and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court. The judgment of the trial court granting partial summary judgment to Hennly is affirmed in Case No. A93A0680. The judgment of the trial court denying summary judgment to First Federal is reversed in Case No. A93A0807.

Judgment affirmed in Case No. A93A0680.

Judgment reversed in Case No. A93A0807. Johnson and Blackburn, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

448 S.E.2d 91, 214 Ga. App. 364, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 2723, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-hennly-gactapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack