Richardson v. Hennly

448 S.E.2d 91, 214 Ga. App. 364, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 2723, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 927
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Richardson v. Hennly. Read the opinion of the Court — 209 Ga. App. 868
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided August 3, 1994·No. A93A0680; A93A0807·Published

Opinion

Smith, Judge.

In Richardson v. Hennly, 209 Ga. App. 868 (434 SE2d 772) (1993), this court affirmed the judgment in Case No. A93A0807 and reversed the judgment in Case No. A93A0680, holding that summary judgment was not appropriate in either case. The Supreme Court reversed our judgment in Hennly v. Richardson, 264 Ga. 355 (444 SE2d 317) (1994), holding that summary judgment was appropriate in both cases. Accordingly, our prior decision in these cases is vacated and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court. The judgment of the trial court granting partial summary judgment to Hennly is affirmed in Case No. A93A0680. The judgment of the trial court denying summary judgment to First Federal is reversed in Case No. A93A0807.

Judgment affirmed in Case No. A93A0680.

Judgment reversed in Case No. A93A0807. Johnson and Blackburn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson v. Hennly, 448 S.E.2d 91, 214 Ga. App. 364, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 2723, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 927 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994).

448 S.E.2d 91 (Richardson v. Hennly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richardson v. Hennly
434 S.E.2d 772 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)
Hennly v. Richardson
444 S.E.2d 317 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1994)