Richardson v. Hartford Board of Education

Second Circuit

Richardson v. Hartford Board of Education

10 F. App'x 13

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMay 10, 2001

DocketDocket No. 00-7120

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 F. App'x 13 (Richardson v. Hartford Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richardson v. Hartford Board of Education, 10 F. App'x 13 (2d Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be AFFIRMED.

Maxine Richardson appeals Judge Underhill’s order dismissing her employment discrimination claim on timeliness grounds. We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court. See Richardson v. Hartford Bd. of Educ., No. 3:98 CV 1910 (D.Conn. Oct. 26, 1999).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be AFFIRMED.

Maxine Richardson appeals Judge Underhill’s order dismissing her employment discrimination claim on timeliness grounds. We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court. See Richardson v. Hartford Bd. of Educ., No. 3:98 CV 1910 (D.Conn. Oct. 26, 1999).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 F. App'x 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-hartford-board-of-education-ca2-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack