Richardson v. Hames

85 S.E. 126, 143 Ga. 392, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 454
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 22, 1915·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

Where a plaintiff fails to make out a prima facie ease, a verdict for the defendant should not be directed, but a judgment of non-suit should be entered. The judgment of the court is affirmed, with direction that plaintiif have leave to take a judgment vacating the verdict and substituting a judgment of nonsuit, when the remittitur is made the judgment of the court below. Barnes v. Carter, 120 Ga. 895 (48 S. E. 387) ; Equitable Manufacturing Co. v. Davis, 130 Ga. 67 (60 S. E. 262).

Judgment affirmed, with direction.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson v. Hames, 85 S.E. 126, 143 Ga. 392, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 454 (Ga. 1915).

85 S.E. 126 (Richardson v. Hames) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. American Mutual Liability Insurance
172 S.E. 600 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Ross v. Durrence
160 S.E. 370 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)