Richardson v. Gray

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: June 2, 2011
• Docket: 10-2374
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2374

MIKE ANTHONY RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

CAPTAIN JIM GRAY,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

CITY OF MARION; CITY OF MARION POLICE DEPARTMENT; CHIEF WILLIE SMITH; MARION D. MULLINS; ANNETTE GARNER, as parent; DEAN BROWN, as guardian of Marion D. Mullins,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:08-cv-03539-RBH)

Submitted: May 24, 2011 Decided: June 2, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mike Anthony Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Charles Baxter, RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, PA, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina; Michelle Parsons Kelley, RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Mike Anthony Richardson appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Richardson v. Captain Gray, No. 4:08-cv-03539-RBH

(D.S.C. Nov. 19, 2010). We deny Richardson’s motions to appoint

counsel and for a transcript at government expense and dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED