Richardson v. Glockner
3 Pennyp. 90
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County·Decided October 16, 1882·No. No. 68; No. 2·Published
Opinion
We think there was sufficient in the evidence of Andrew Spath under which the lot in question could be identified from the description contained in the mechanic’s lien. The Courts are in favor of sustaining these claims when the property is so described that those acquainted with the neighborhood are able to identify it.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Richardson v. Glockner, 3 Pennyp. 90 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1882).
3 Pennyp. 90 (Richardson v. Glockner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.