Richardson v. Frick Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Richardson v. Frick Co., Inc.

197 A. 151, 329 Pa. 148, 1938 Pa. LEXIS 480

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 12, 1938

DocketAppeal, 73

StatusPublished

This text of 197 A. 151 (Richardson v. Frick Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richardson v. Frick Co., Inc., 197 A. 151, 329 Pa. 148, 1938 Pa. LEXIS 480 (Pa. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We are all agreed that the action of the court below in entering judgment n. o. v. was correct. Appellant’s evidence failed to establish a commission contract with appellee. A review of the record shows that all the testimony of appellant is utterly inconsistent with the existence of the alleged contract. As the parties alone are interested in the facts, it is unnecessary to detail the evidence and their contentions.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

We are all agreed that the action of the court below in entering judgment n. o. v. was correct. Appellant’s evidence failed to establish a commission contract with appellee. A review of the record shows that all the testimony of appellant is utterly inconsistent with the existence of the alleged contract. As the parties alone are interested in the facts, it is unnecessary to detail the evidence and their contentions.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 A. 151, 329 Pa. 148, 1938 Pa. LEXIS 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-frick-co-inc-pa-1938.