Richardson v. Foster

Fourth Circuit

Richardson v. Foster

163 F. App'x 240

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 24, 2006·No. No. 05-2276·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lenir Richardson appeals the district court order summarily dismissing her complaint as frivolous and for failing to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the district court order and the record and affirm for the reasons of the district court. See Richardson v. Foster, No. CA-05-1158-1TSE (E.D. Va., filed Oct. 25, 2005; entered Oct. 26, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

[241]*241 AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Lenir Richardson appeals the district court order summarily dismissing her complaint as frivolous and for failing to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the district court order and the record and affirm for the reasons of the district court. See Richardson v. Foster, No. CA-05-1158-1TSE (E.D. Va., filed Oct. 25, 2005; entered Oct. 26, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

[241]*241 AFFIRMED

Richardson v. Foster, 163 F. App'x 240 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

163 F. App'x 240 (Richardson v. Foster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related