Richardson v. Faulk

651 F. App'x 153
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 31, 2016
DocketNo. 16-1125
StatusPublished

This text of 651 F. App'x 153 (Richardson v. Faulk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richardson v. Faulk, 651 F. App'x 153 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

[154]*154Dismissed by unpublished per curiam • opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lenir Richardson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her motion to remand and denying her motion for recusal. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Richardson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appeal-able interlocutory or collateral order. Richardson may seek review of these decisions on appeal from the court’s final judgment. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process,

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
651 F. App'x 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-faulk-ca4-2016.