Richardson v. Erie Railroad Co.

269 A.D. 805, 55 N.Y.S.2d 478, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3929

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: Upon the plaintiff’s proof and particularly the testimony as to the failure of the wigwag signals to operate, we think there was sufficient to take the case to the jury. (Carr v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 225 N. Y. 44; Elias v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co., 226 N. Y. 154; Hand v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co., 267 App. Div. 1037, affd. 293 N. Y. 845.) All concur, except Love, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance. (The judgment dismisses the complaint at close of plaintiff’s case in an action for damages for personal injuries arising out of a collision between an automobile and a freight train.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Dowling, McCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson v. Erie Railroad Co., 269 A.D. 805, 55 N.Y.S.2d 478, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3929 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

269 A.D. 805 (Richardson v. Erie Railroad Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Elias v. . Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.
123 N.E. 73 (New York Court of Appeals, 1919)
Carr v. . Pennsylvania R.R. Co.
121 N.E. 473 (New York Court of Appeals, 1918)
Hand v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
59 N.E.2d 439 (New York Court of Appeals, 1944)
Hand v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
267 A.D. 1037 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)