Home/New York Court of Appeals/Richardson v. . Emmett

Richardson v. . Emmett

63 N.E. 1118, 171 N.Y. 651, 1902 N.Y. LEXIS 932
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Richardson v. . Emmett. Read the opinion of the Court — 170 N.Y. 412 →
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 13, 1902·Published

Opinion

Motion for restitution denied, without costs, but with leave to renew in case of unnecessary delay on the part of the defendant in prosecuting the new trial, or in the event that such trial shall result in favor of the plaintiffs. (See 170 N. Y. 412.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson v. . Emmett, 63 N.E. 1118, 171 N.Y. 651, 1902 N.Y. LEXIS 932 (N.Y. 1902).

63 N.E. 1118 (Richardson v. . Emmett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richardson v. . Emmett
63 N.E. 440 (New York Court of Appeals, 1902)