Richardson v. . Edwards
72 S.E. 482, 156 N.C. 590, 1911 N.C. LEXIS 227
Opinion
The form of the second issue is defective. The record shows that his Honor instructed the jury to consider the issue as if it read, “Did the plaintiff contribute by his own negligence to his injury?” which is the usual and approved form. We think the error was fully cured.
We have examined the other assignments of error, all of which relate to the charge of the court, and find them to be without substantial merit.
The case was fairly put to the jury in accord with the well-settled decisions of this Court.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Richardson v. . Edwards, 72 S.E. 482, 156 N.C. 590, 1911 N.C. LEXIS 227 (N.C. 1911).
72 S.E. 482 (Richardson v. . Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stadiem v. . Harvell
179 S.E. 448 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
State v. . Snipes
117 S.E. 500 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1923)
Croom v. . Lumber Co.
108 S.E. 735 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1921)
Croom v. Goldsboro Lumber Co.
182 N.C. 217 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1921)
Fourth National Bank v. Wilson
84 S.E. 866 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1915)
Donnell v. City of Greensboro
80 S.E. 377 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1913)
State v. . Murphy
72 S.E. 1075 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1911)