Richardson v. Dixon
This text of Richardson v. Dixon (Richardson v. Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2024-2815 _____________________________
KEYON L. RICHARDSON,
Appellant,
v.
RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Holmes County. Russell S. Roberts, Judge.
December 10, 2025
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Edwards v. Crews, 124 So. 3d 422, 423 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (citation omitted) (“Challenges to the original probable cause are properly raised at trial and on direct appeal but are not a viable basis for postconviction relief . . . or a postconviction writ of habeas corpus.”).
BILBREY, KELSEY, and LONG, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Keyon Leonard Richardson, pro se, Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Sheron Wells, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Richardson v. Dixon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-dixon-fladistctapp-2025.