Richardson v. Division of Corrections

West Virginia Court of Claims

Richardson v. Division of Corrections

21 Ct. Cl. 74

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedJanuary 26, 1996

DocketCC-95-376

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Ct. Cl. 74 (Richardson v. Division of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richardson v. Division of Corrections, 21 Ct. Cl. 74 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

AGREED ORDER

[75]*75Entered this 26th day of January, 1996. LAURA ELLEN BUCHKO Counsel for Claimant JOHN S. DALPORTO Senior Assistant Attorney General Counsel for Respondent JEFFREY G. BLAYDES Assistant Attorney General Counsel for Respondent

On a prior day came the Claimant, by counsel, Laura Ellen Buchko, Esquire, and came the Respondent, by counsel,’John s. Dalporto, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Jeffrey G. Blaydes, Assistant Attorney General, who represented to the Court that the matters at issue in this claim have been fully, resolved and that the parties have agreed and stipulated that the sum of Five Hundred Sixty-nine thousand, Six Hundred Forty-nine and 42/100 dollars ($569,649.42) is the total amount of money due the Claimant for the subject period, which period includes January 31, 1996, and that such sum includes any and all claims for “advance quarterly premiums”, interest and penalties which have been or may be asserted as due and owing by the Claimant under the Workers’ Compensation Act at this time.

Upon all of which, it is hereby ORDERED that the Claimant is granted an award in the total amount of Five Hundred Sixty-nine thousand, Six Hundred Forty-nine and 42/100 dollars ($569,649.42), and the case is hereby dismissed from the docket, with prejudice.

ROBERTM. STEPTOE Presiding Judge

Seen and Approved by:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AGREED ORDER

[75]*75Entered this 26th day of January, 1996. LAURA ELLEN BUCHKO Counsel for Claimant JOHN S. DALPORTO Senior Assistant Attorney General Counsel for Respondent JEFFREY G. BLAYDES Assistant Attorney General Counsel for Respondent

On a prior day came the Claimant, by counsel, Laura Ellen Buchko, Esquire, and came the Respondent, by counsel,’John s. Dalporto, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Jeffrey G. Blaydes, Assistant Attorney General, who represented to the Court that the matters at issue in this claim have been fully, resolved and that the parties have agreed and stipulated that the sum of Five Hundred Sixty-nine thousand, Six Hundred Forty-nine and 42/100 dollars ($569,649.42) is the total amount of money due the Claimant for the subject period, which period includes January 31, 1996, and that such sum includes any and all claims for “advance quarterly premiums”, interest and penalties which have been or may be asserted as due and owing by the Claimant under the Workers’ Compensation Act at this time.

Upon all of which, it is hereby ORDERED that the Claimant is granted an award in the total amount of Five Hundred Sixty-nine thousand, Six Hundred Forty-nine and 42/100 dollars ($569,649.42), and the case is hereby dismissed from the docket, with prejudice.

ROBERTM. STEPTOE Presiding Judge

Seen and Approved by:

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Ct. Cl. 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-division-of-corrections-wvctcl-1996.