Richardson v. Dade County

Supreme Court of Florida

Richardson v. Dade County

207 So. 2d 428

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJanuary 24, 1968

DocketNo. 36463

StatusPublished

This text of 207 So. 2d 428 (Richardson v. Dade County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richardson v. Dade County, 207 So. 2d 428 (Fla. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this workmen’s compensation matter we have heard oral argument and considered the records and briefs. We find that the order of the Florida Industrial Commission entered on April 20, 1967 comports with the essential requirements of the law. The writ of certiorari is therefore denied. The petitioner’s motion for an attorney’s fee in this Court is also denied.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this workmen’s compensation matter we have heard oral argument and considered the records and briefs. We find that the order of the Florida Industrial Commission entered on April 20, 1967 comports with the essential requirements of the law. The writ of certiorari is therefore denied. The petitioner’s motion for an attorney’s fee in this Court is also denied.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 So. 2d 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-dade-county-fla-1968.