Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Richardson v. Coy

Richardson v. Coy

28 A.D.2d 640, 280 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4156
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 18, 1967
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 28 A.D.2d 640 (Richardson v. Coy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richardson v. Coy, 28 A.D.2d 640, 280 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4156 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

Memorandum: The complaint states a cause of action, at least in recission. There might also be concurrent jurisdiction in the court for recission and money damages. (Heckscher v. Edenborn, 203 N. Y. 210, 220; 20 N. Y. Jur., Equity, § 26.) We do not rule out the possibility of other forms of relief. Inasmuch as the motion is addressed to the entire complaint it must be denied in all respects. (Lane v. Mercury Record Corp., 21 A D 2d 602, affd. 18 N Y 2d 889; Foley v. D’Agostino, 21 A D 2d 60.) Motions to dismiss should not be granted unless it is very clear that there can be no relief under any of the facts alleged in the pleading for the relief requested or for other relief. (Foley v. D’Agostino, supra; Donnelly v. Rochester Gas & Elec. Corp., 21 A D 2d 740; CPLR 3013, 3017, subd. [a]; 3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, par. 3013.03.) (Appeal from order and judgments of Monroe Special Term dismissing complaint in an action to rescind a contract.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Del Vecehio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lydon v. Lydon
110 Misc. 2d 966 (New York Family Court, 1981)
Small v. Memorial Hospital
106 Misc. 2d 487 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)
Schlottman Agency, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
70 A.D.2d 1041 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Sorichetti v. City of New York
95 Misc. 2d 451 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)
Mink Hollow Development Corp. v. State
87 Misc. 2d 61 (New York State Court of Claims, 1976)
Charles O. Desch, Inc. v. State
50 A.D.2d 253 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
Thompson v. Lincoln Budget Corp.
88 Misc. 2d 894 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1975)
Sutton v. Duke
176 S.E.2d 161 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 A.D.2d 640, 280 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-coy-nyappdiv-1967.