Richardson v. Court of Common Pleas Philadelphia County

163 A.3d 397, 2016 WL 7010502, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 2724
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 30, 2016
DocketNo. 162 EM 2016
StatusPublished

This text of 163 A.3d 397 (Richardson v. Court of Common Pleas Philadelphia County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richardson v. Court of Common Pleas Philadelphia County, 163 A.3d 397, 2016 WL 7010502, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 2724 (Pa. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that hybrid representation is not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.

It is noted that Petitioner’s PCRA petition has been pending before the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County for more than two years.

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to serve a copy of this order on the President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Ali
10 A.3d 282 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 A.3d 397, 2016 WL 7010502, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 2724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-court-of-common-pleas-philadelphia-county-pa-2016.