Richardson v. Cooper

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Richardson v. Cooper

194 So. 2d 28

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 10, 1967

DocketNo. 351

StatusPublished

This text of 194 So. 2d 28 (Richardson v. Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richardson v. Cooper, 194 So. 2d 28 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs, William H. Richardson- and Royal Motel, Inc., appeal from an order-granting summary judgment for the defendants, Saul Cooper and Ida Cooper.

The court has carefully considered the record on appeal, the briefs and oral argument of counsel for the parties. From-such consideration we find no reversible.error.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, C. J., ANDREWS, J., and: WILLSON, JESSE H., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs, William H. Richardson- and Royal Motel, Inc., appeal from an order-granting summary judgment for the defendants, Saul Cooper and Ida Cooper.

The court has carefully considered the record on appeal, the briefs and oral argument of counsel for the parties. From-such consideration we find no reversible.error.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, C. J., ANDREWS, J., and: WILLSON, JESSE H., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 So. 2d 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-cooper-fladistctapp-1967.