Richardson v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided May 12, 2026·No. 1:25-cv-00287·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DEVIN RICHARDSON, Plaintiff, – against – CITY OF NEW YORK, CAPTAIN MOTA, LT. GAVIN HOOP, P.O. HUSAMEDIN UMER, P.O. Valentin Order HOLIKA ESPINAL, TAMIKA POWELL, DANIEL 25-cv-00287 (ER) KISS, KIM THEODORE, JAMES SECRETO, TOUSSAINT FITTS, P.O. KEILA SANCHEZ, P.O. CHRISTOPHER BARSAMIAN, P.O. JEFFREY ABREU, P.O. JENNIFER GIANNONE, and P.O. EDUARDO MOSQUEA,

Defendants. RAMOS, D.J.: Richardson, who is currently incarcerated and proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”), brought this action on January 2, 2025 against several New York City Housing Authority (“NYCHA”) employees and police officers. Doc. 1. On December 16, 2026, Richardson filed a first amended complaint, which added another NYCHA defendant, Toussaint Fitts. Doc. 30 at 1. As Richardson is proceeding IFP, on January 6, 2026, the Court issued an order of service as to Fitts. Doc. 38. On April 6, 2026, Richardson filed a second amended complaint. Doc. 57. On April 15, 2026 a group of NYCHA defendants wrote the Court, in part notifying the Court that Fitts had not yet been served. Doc. 58. On April 16, 2026, the Court issued another order of service as to Fitts. Doc. 59. On May 8, 2026, summons was returned unexecuted because “Fitts, T. has retired and no longer works at property.” Doc. 64. Under Valentin v. Dinkins, a pro se litigant is entitled to assistance from the district court in identifying a defendant. 121 F.3d 72, 76 (2d Cir. 1997). In the second amended complaint, Richardson supplies sufficient information to permit NY CHA to identify former employee, Toussaint Fitts. It is therefore ordered that the New York City Law Department, which is the attorney for and agent of NYCHA, must ascertain the last known residential address for Fitts. The Law Department must provide this information to Richardson and the Court within thirty days of the date of this order. Once the Court has received this information, if necessary, it will issue an order directing the Clerk of Court to complete the USM-285 forms with the residential address for Fitts and deliver to the U.S. Marshals Service all documents necessary to effect service. The Clerk of Court is directed to notify the New York City Law Department of this order. The Court requests that the New York City Law Department respond as directed.

It is SO ORDERED. New York, New York EDGARDORAMOS,U.S.DJ

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson v. City of New York, (S.D.N.Y. 2026).

Richardson v. City of New York (Richardson v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.