Richardson v. Citizens National Bank
This text of 236 A.D. 885 (Richardson v. Citizens National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order modified by denying [886]*886the motion as to the first cause of action and by imposing as terms for granting the motion in part, payment by respondent of full costs to the time of the granting of the motion and ten dollars motion costs and as so modified the order is affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party, on the ground that as to the first cause of action the defendant has failed to show that he has a meritorious defense; as to the second cause of action the Statute of Limitations is, apparently, in this case, in view of the allegations of the complaint, a sufficiently meritorious defense to allow the same to be interposed by this estate. All concur, except Thompson and Crosby, JJ., who dissent and vote for affirmance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
236 A.D. 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-citizens-national-bank-nyappdiv-1932.