Richardson v. Bosselman
164 F. 781, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 5034
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedJune 10, 1907
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 164 F. 781 (Richardson v. Bosselman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Richardson v. Bosselman, 164 F. 781, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 5034 (circtsdny 1907).
Opinion
Tlie motion to vacate writ and set aside service is denied. Although "in the nature of replevin/' it is not strictly a writ of replevin, and not to be rendered inoperative by the technical provision of state practice. See American Tobacco Co. v. Werckmeister, 146 Fed. 375, 76 C. C. A. 647.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Stern v. Remick
164 F. 781 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1908)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
164 F. 781, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 5034, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-bosselman-circtsdny-1907.