Richardson v. Bosselman
164 F. 781, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 5034
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided June 10, 1907·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Tlie motion to vacate writ and set aside service is denied. Although "in the nature of replevin/' it is not strictly a writ of replevin, and not to be rendered inoperative by the technical provision of state practice. See American Tobacco Co. v. Werckmeister, 146 Fed. 375, 76 C. C. A. 647.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Richardson v. Bosselman, 164 F. 781, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 5034 (circtsdny 1907).
164 F. 781 (Richardson v. Bosselman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stern v. Remick
164 F. 781 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1908)