Richardson v. Board of Commissioners
92 S.E. 719, 173 N.C. 685, 1917 N.C. LEXIS 370
Opinion
This is an action brought to enjoin the defendant from issuing bonds to the amount of $50,000, the proceeds to be used for repairing and improving the public roads of the county and building a county home, and • other necessary county purposes. It presents the same questions as were decided, at this term, in Reads v. City of Durham, ante, 668, and Rankin v. Gaston County, and is governed by those decisions.
There was no error in Judge Carter’s ruling sustaining the bond issue.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Richardson v. Board of Commissioners, 92 S.E. 719, 173 N.C. 685, 1917 N.C. LEXIS 370 (N.C. 1917).
92 S.E. 719 (Richardson v. Board of Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reade v. . Durham
92 S.E. 712 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1917)