Richardson v. Board of Commissioners

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Richardson v. Board of Commissioners

92 S.E. 719, 173 N.C. 685, 1917 N.C. LEXIS 370

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedMay 30, 1917

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 92 S.E. 719 (Richardson v. Board of Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richardson v. Board of Commissioners, 92 S.E. 719, 173 N.C. 685, 1917 N.C. LEXIS 370 (N.C. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Walker, J.

This is an action brought to enjoin the defendant from issuing bonds to the amount of $50,000, the proceeds to be used for repairing and improving the public roads of the county and building a county home, and • other necessary county purposes. It presents the same questions as were decided, at this term, in Reads v. City of Durham, ante, 668, and Rankin v. Gaston County, and is governed by those decisions.

There was no error in Judge Carter’s ruling sustaining the bond issue.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker, J.

This is an action brought to enjoin the defendant from issuing bonds to the amount of $50,000, the proceeds to be used for repairing and improving the public roads of the county and building a county home, and • other necessary county purposes. It presents the same questions as were decided, at this term, in Reads v. City of Durham, ante, 668, and Rankin v. Gaston County, and is governed by those decisions.

There was no error in Judge Carter’s ruling sustaining the bond issue.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 S.E. 719, 173 N.C. 685, 1917 N.C. LEXIS 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-board-of-commissioners-nc-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack