Richardson v. Bennett

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: September 24, 2004
• Docket: 04-7210
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7210

TOMMY RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BOYD BENNETT; JOSEPH H. LOFTON; WILLIAM L. BURDEN, JR.; P. ASBELL; R. BROADNAX,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-211-5-BO)

Submitted: September 16, 2004 Decided: September 24, 2004

Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tommy Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Tommy Richardson appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See Richardson v. Bennett, No. CA-04-211-5-

BO (E.D.N.C. June 21, 2004). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -