Richardson v. Bartlett

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Richardson v. Bartlett

223 Mass. 450

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedMarch 24, 1916

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 223 Mass. 450 (Richardson v. Bartlett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richardson v. Bartlett, 223 Mass. 450 (Mass. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

This record affords no foundation for the contention that the firm, with whom the defendant made the contract, was not composed of the persons named as plaintiffs in the writ and declaration as amended.

The court had authority to allow the amendment adding as one of the plaintiffs the person who, according to the testimony, was a partner at the time of the contract upon which the action was brought.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

This record affords no foundation for the contention that the firm, with whom the defendant made the contract, was not composed of the persons named as plaintiffs in the writ and declaration as amended.

The court had authority to allow the amendment adding as one of the plaintiffs the person who, according to the testimony, was a partner at the time of the contract upon which the action was brought.

Exceptions overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

223 Mass. 450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-bartlett-mass-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack