Richardson v. Barnhart
This text of Richardson v. Barnhart (Richardson v. Barnhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT September 20, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-60070 Summary Calendar
SHEILA D. RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Defendant-Appellee.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:03-CV-78-SAA --------------------
Before BENAVIDES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Sheila D. Richardson appeals the affirmance of the
Commissioner’s denial of her claim for disability benefits. The
Commissioner has filed an unopposed motion to remand pursuant to
the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to allow
reconsideration of the denial of benefits.
A remand pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C.
§ 405(g) requires that this court also enter a judgment
affirming, reversing, or modifying the Commissioner’s decision.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 04-60070 -2-
See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296-97 (1993). Therefore,
we REVERSE the district court’s judgment, GRANT the motion to
remand, and REMAND to the district court with instructions to
remand to the Commissioner for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Richardson v. Barnhart, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-barnhart-ca5-2004.