Richardson v. Bailey

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Richardson v. Bailey

89 A. 840, 77 N.H. 184, 1914 N.H. LEXIS 9

DecidedFebruary 3, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 89 A. 840 (Richardson v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richardson v. Bailey, 89 A. 840, 77 N.H. 184, 1914 N.H. LEXIS 9 (N.H. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Young, J.

Mrs. Stubbs says, in substance: I give my husband my homestead farm provided he takes care of my son; and on my husband’s death, my son is to have one thousand dollars out of the above property — not one thousand dollars and his board and clothes. It is probable, therefore, that she intended her son to have his boards and clothes as long as her husband lived and one thousand dollars upon her husband’s death. The plaintiff is advised that the farm is not charged with Bailey’s support.

Exception sustained.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young, J.

Mrs. Stubbs says, in substance: I give my husband my homestead farm provided he takes care of my son; and on my husband’s death, my son is to have one thousand dollars out of the above property — not one thousand dollars and his board and clothes. It is probable, therefore, that she intended her son to have his boards and clothes as long as her husband lived and one thousand dollars upon her husband’s death. The plaintiff is advised that the farm is not charged with Bailey’s support.

Exception sustained.

All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 A. 840, 77 N.H. 184, 1914 N.H. LEXIS 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-bailey-nh-1914.