Richardson v. Aramark/Sedgewick CMS

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Richardson v. Aramark/Sedgewick CMS

134 So. 3d 1133, 2014 WL 628032, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2108

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 18, 2014

DocketNo. 1D13-4138

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 134 So. 3d 1133 (Richardson v. Aramark/Sedgewick CMS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richardson v. Aramark/Sedgewick CMS, 134 So. 3d 1133, 2014 WL 628032, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2108 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based ' on Castellanos v. Next Door Company, 124 So.3d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), we AFFIRM. In so doing, we certify that our disposition of the instant case passes upon the same question we certified in Castellanos. Id. at 394. We, therefore, decline to follow the Appellant’s suggestion that we certify additional questions of great public importance relating to the instant case.

ROWE, MARSTILLER, and RAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Based ' on Castellanos v. Next Door Company, 124 So.3d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), we AFFIRM. In so doing, we certify that our disposition of the instant case passes upon the same question we certified in Castellanos. Id. at 394. We, therefore, decline to follow the Appellant’s suggestion that we certify additional questions of great public importance relating to the instant case.

ROWE, MARSTILLER, and RAY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 So. 3d 1133, 2014 WL 628032, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-aramarksedgewick-cms-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack