Richardson v. Almuldi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Richardson v. Almuldi

238 A.D.2d 494, 657 N.Y.S.2d 908, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4040

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 21, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 238 A.D.2d 494 (Richardson v. Almuldi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richardson v. Almuldi, 238 A.D.2d 494, 657 N.Y.S.2d 908, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4040 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), entered October 23, 1996, which, upon the granting of the defendant’s motion made at the close of the plaintiff’s case for judgment as a matter of law, is in favor of the defendant and against him and dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that the allegedly dangerous condition described by the plaintiff was a trivial defect which lacked the characteristics of a trap or snare (see, Julian v Sementelli, 234 AD2d 866; Trincere v County v Suffolk, 232 AD2d 400; Guerrieri v Summa, 193 AD2d 647). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), entered October 23, 1996, which, upon the granting of the defendant’s motion made at the close of the plaintiff’s case for judgment as a matter of law, is in favor of the defendant and against him and dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that the allegedly dangerous condition described by the plaintiff was a trivial defect which lacked the characteristics of a trap or snare (see, Julian v Sementelli, 234 AD2d 866; Trincere v County v Suffolk, 232 AD2d 400; Guerrieri v Summa, 193 AD2d 647). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 A.D.2d 494, 657 N.Y.S.2d 908, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-almuldi-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack