Richardson, Johnny
This text of Richardson, Johnny (Richardson, Johnny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-92,586-01
EX PARTE JOHNNY RICHARDSON, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1624475-A IN THE 179TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon and sentenced to forty
years’ imprisonment. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of
conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because trial counsel was ineffective. He
also contends that he was denied the right to effective assistance of trial during the time period for
filing a motion for new trial. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle to relief.
Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The
trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing the record, 2
the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a
hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be
represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent at the hearing. See TEX .
CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately
notify this Court of counsel’s name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s
performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court should also make findings
related to the time gap between when Applicant mailed his pro se motions and when the trial court
time-stamped these motions as filed. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions
that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: May 26, 2021 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Richardson, Johnny, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-johnny-texcrimapp-2021.