Richardson, H. v. CCP Phila. Cty.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
HIRAM RICHARDSON, : No. 162 EM 2016 :
Petitioner :
: :
v. :
: :
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, :
:
Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2016, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See
Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that hybrid representation is
not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of
record.
It is noted that Petitioner’s PCRA petition has been pending before the Court of
Common Pleas of Philadelphia County for more than two years.
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to serve a copy of this order on the President
Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Richardson, H. v. CCP Phila. Cty. (Richardson, H. v. CCP Phila. Cty.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.