Richardson Ex Rel. Richardson v. Grayson

113 S.E.2d 922, 252 N.C. 476, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 585
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 4, 1960·No. 395·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

WinboRNE, C. J.

Of the many assignments of error, based upon exceptions to matters occurring in the course of the trial, and in the charge of the court to the jury, plaintiff groups, in his brief, and assigns as error several portions of the charge as to proximate cause on the first issue. Throughout the charge on this issue the court placed upon the plaintiff the burden of showing that defendant’s negligence was the proximate cause of plaintiff’s injury. This constitutes prejudicial error within the rulings in Price v. Gray, 246 N.C. 162, 97 S.E. 2d 844, and Pugh v. Smith, 247 N.C. 264, 100 S.E. 2d *477 503. Hence on authority of the the holding of the opinions of this Court in these two cases, there must be a new trial.

Therefore it is deemed unnecessary to expressly consider other assignments of error. They may not recur upon another trial.

For error pointed out, let there be a New trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson Ex Rel. Richardson v. Grayson, 113 S.E.2d 922, 252 N.C. 476, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 585 (N.C. 1960).

113 S.E.2d 922 (Richardson Ex Rel. Richardson v. Grayson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. Smith
534 F. Supp. 804 (W.D. North Carolina, 1982)
State v. Cummings
265 S.E.2d 923 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)
Hester v. Miller
255 S.E.2d 318 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1979)