Richardson, Ex Parte Chelsea Lea

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 2, 2011
DocketAP-76,673
StatusPublished

This text of Richardson, Ex Parte Chelsea Lea (Richardson, Ex Parte Chelsea Lea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richardson, Ex Parte Chelsea Lea, (Tex. 2011).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,673

EX PARTE CHELSEA LEA RICHARDSON

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IN CAUSE NO. 0929234A IN THE 297 TH DISTRICT COURT TARRANT COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

This is a post conviction application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the

provisions of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.071.

In June 2005, a jury convicted applicant of the offense of capital murder. The jury

answered the special issues submitted pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article

37.071, and the trial court, accordingly, set punishment at death. This Court affirmed

applicant’s conviction and sentence on direct appeal. Richardson v. State, No. AP-75,200 Richardson - 2

(Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 23, 2008 ) (not designated for publication).

Applicant presents nine allegations in which she challenges the validity of her

conviction and sentence. Following an evidentiary hearing, the trial judge entered agreed

findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court found that applicant was entitled to

relief on her allegation that the State, through its prosecutor Mike Parrish, failed to reveal

Brady material regarding an examination of its key witness by a psychologist, which affected

the punishment phase of her trial. The court recommended that relief should be granted and

that applicant should receive a new punishment trial.

This Court has reviewed the record with respect to the allegations made by applicant.

The trial judge’s findings and conclusions are supported by the record. Relief is granted, and

this case is remanded to the trial court for new punishment proceedings. All other relief is

denied.

DELIVERED: November 2, 2011

DO NOT PUBLISH

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Richardson, Ex Parte Chelsea Lea, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-ex-parte-chelsea-lea-texcrimapp-2011.