Richardson-Bass v. State Center Community College District

District Court, E.D. California·Decided May 18, 2021·No. 1:19-cv-01566·Unknown

Opinion

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

10 CRYSTAL RICHARDSON-BASS, Case No. 1:19-cv-01566-AWI-SAB

11 Plaintiff, ORDER ENTERING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 12 v. (ECF No. 42) DISTRICT, et al., 14 Defendants. 15

16 19 A. Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, 20 or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any 21 purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby 22 stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties 23 acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 24 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the 25 limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal 26 principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section XIII(C), below, that this 27 Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be 1 applied when a party seeks permission from the Court to file material under seal. 2 II. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 3 4 A. This action is likely to involve public school student and employee information for 5 which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than 6 prosecution of this action is warranted. Such confidential and private materials and information 7 consist of, among other things, confidential personal or financial information, student records, 8 information regarding confidential investigations and/or interviews by independent investigators 9 or medical/mental health information (including information implicating privacy rights of third 10 parties), information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or 11 otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or 12 common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution 13 of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the 14 parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable 15 necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their 16 handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such 17 information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be 18 designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good 19 faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good 20 cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 21 III. DEFINITIONS 22 A. Action: This pending federal lawsuit, as designated in the caption above. 23 24 B. Challenging Party: A Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 25 information or items under this Order. 26 C. “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: Information (regardless of how it is 27 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule 1 of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. 2 D. Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their support 3 staff). 4 5 E. Designating Party: A Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that 6 it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 7 F. Disclosure or Discovery Material: All items or information, regardless of the 8 medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, 9 testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or 10 responses to discovery in this matter. 11 G. Expert: A person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 12 the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a 13 consultant in this Action. 14 15 H. House Counsel: Attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. House 16 Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 17 I. Non-Party: Any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 18 entity not named as a Party to this action. 19 20 J. Outside Counsel of Record: Attorneys who are not employees of a party to this 21 Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have appeared in this 22 Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of 23 that party and includes support staff. 24 K. Party: Any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 25 consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 26 L. Producing Party: A Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 27 Material in this Action. 1 M. Professional Vendors: Persons or entities that provide litigation support services 2 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and 3 organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and 4 subcontractors. 5 N. Protected Material: Any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 6 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 7 8 O. Receiving Party: A Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 9 Producing Party. 10 IV. SCOPE 11 A. The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected 12 Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected 13 Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any 14 testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected 15 Material. 16 17 B. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the trial 18 judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. 19 V. DURATION 20 21 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Order 22 shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order 23 otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims 24 and defenses in this Action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the 25 completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this Action, 26 including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to 27 applicable law. 2 A. Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection 3 4 1. Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection 5 under this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies 6 under the appropriate standards. The Designating Party must designate for protection only those 7 parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify so that other 8 portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not 9 warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 10 2. Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. 11 Designations that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper 12 purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber the case development process or to impose unnecessary 13 expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Designating Party to sanctions. 14 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson-Bass v. State Center Community College District, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

Richardson-Bass v. State Center Community College District (Richardson-Bass v. State Center Community College District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)