Richardson, Alan Jamar
This text of Richardson, Alan Jamar (Richardson, Alan Jamar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-84,841-01
EX PARTE ALAN JAMAR RICHARDSON, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1212794-A IN THE 182ND DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
OPINION
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of sexual assault
and sentenced to eleven years’ imprisonment. The First Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction.
Richardson v. State, No. 01-11-01083-CR (Tex. App. — Houston [1st Dist.] November 29, 2012)
(not designated for publication).
Applicant contends that appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel
failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to advise him of 2
his right to petition pro se for discretionary review.
Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court
has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to advise Applicant
that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to advise him of his right to file a pro se petition for
discretionary review. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956
S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).
We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition
for discretionary review of the judgment of the First Court of Appeals in Cause No. 01-11-01083-CR
that affirmed his conviction in Cause No.121279401010 from the 182nd District Court of Harris
County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of
the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.
Delivered: April 13, 2016 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Richardson, Alan Jamar, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-alan-jamar-texcrimapp-2016.