Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Richards v. Walt Disney World Co.

Richards v. Walt Disney World Co.

139 So. 3d 476, 2014 WL 2217239, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8258
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 30, 2014
DocketNo. 5D13-1882
StatusPublished

This text of 139 So. 3d 476 (Richards v. Walt Disney World Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richards v. Walt Disney World Co., 139 So. 3d 476, 2014 WL 2217239, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8258 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the summary judgment entered in this trip-and-fall case. We conclude that questions of fact exist as to what caused Appellant to trip and whether the object that caused the trip and fall was open and obvious. See Javits v. RSMO Independence Mgmt. Consultants, Inc., 738 So.2d 521 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Abes v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc., 610 So.2d 709 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

TORPY, C.J., SAWAYA and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Abes v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.
610 So. 2d 709 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Javits v. RSMO Independence Management Consultants, Inc.
738 So. 2d 521 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 So. 3d 476, 2014 WL 2217239, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richards-v-walt-disney-world-co-fladistctapp-2014.