Richards v. Walt Disney World Co.
139 So. 3d 476, 2014 WL 2217239, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8258
Opinion
We reverse the summary judgment entered in this trip-and-fall case. We conclude that questions of fact exist as to what caused Appellant to trip and whether the object that caused the trip and fall was open and obvious. See Javits v. RSMO Independence Mgmt. Consultants, Inc., 738 So.2d 521 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Abes v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc., 610 So.2d 709 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Richards v. Walt Disney World Co., 139 So. 3d 476, 2014 WL 2217239, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8258 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).
139 So. 3d 476 (Richards v. Walt Disney World Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Abes v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.
610 So. 2d 709 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Javits v. RSMO Independence Management Consultants, Inc.
738 So. 2d 521 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)